|
Post by Hawks on Jul 4, 2015 22:44:33 GMT -5
The idea would be to actually increase the overall cost. So that rather than committing 10 mil to a player you have to commit 30 mil. Also, with regard to your earlier comments about helping teams without cap space, ive got a ton of it, even after signing my RFAs. I just made a suggestion that I thought made a lot of sense for the betterment of the league. Im all about adding strategy wherever we can (and in a way that wouldnt require any additional Commish work!). This discussion seems to come up every year, and we've been over it multiple times. Forcing a GM to commit to 30m just means that he'll be committed to 10m for 1 year & 3.5m for 2 years. You're not fixing anything, you're just making it more of a pain in the ass to sign the only truly available players this time of the year. On another note, whats everyone's opinion on removing RFA's from the board bidding process entirely, offer sheets are nearly impossible to get value from and have been so incredibly rare that all it really does is create more work for Jon to set them all up and me to check them all every night during FA. If 1 GM actually wants to attempt an offer sheet, we could come up with more direct and instant method (probably just 1 thread where you submit your sheet on the first day or whatever)
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Jul 5, 2015 15:47:01 GMT -5
Turns out Jon already has made the RFA players listing for this season, so starting next year we'll be listing RFA's differently and putting any and all Offer Sheets in one thread to themselves.
The original system of listing everyone as we do was designed for much more activity (works great for UFAs), since that activity is just not there, it makes sense to change it. This is long overdue really.
|
|