|
Post by MontyBurns on Aug 2, 2011 12:16:39 GMT -5
[Absolutely correct Gavin, well said, my only concern is that teams are able to get to the 35 player minimum in time for the start of the season. You get 2 wks into the season to fill your roster. That's the 2 wks Gavin talked about, except I agree with Adam, there may be no one left. Teams had this problem last season as well. I don't really care much for the new rule, and have already expressed some concerns. I think that Roster requirments should at least be lowerd a bit, to accomodate new rule, I had suggested that, last season, as the handwriting was on the wall, even before the rule change. JMO I think all we need to do is divide total players by total teams, which should be easy from the csv file. If the number is above 40 its all good. If its lower than 45 we may want to consider Lowering the roster MAX, not the min. But just like the real nhl, u better be able to ice a team if 2 players at the same position get injured.
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Aug 2, 2011 14:21:10 GMT -5
Is anyone even near the roster max?
|
|
|
Post by AvsGM on Aug 2, 2011 14:27:09 GMT -5
I think all we need to do is divide total players by total teams, which should be easy from the csv file. If the number is above 40 its all good. If its lower than 45 we may want to consider Lowering the roster MAX, not the min. That doesn't really make sense, what if it's 41, 42, 43 or 44?
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Aug 2, 2011 14:33:44 GMT -5
I think he meant 35
|
|
|
Post by AvsGM on Aug 2, 2011 16:03:07 GMT -5
None the less, the answer is 40.42
|
|
|
Post by MontyBurns on Aug 2, 2011 21:21:13 GMT -5
When i was talking ididnt mean a specific number. I just meant if the ratios dont work out maybe we need to lower the max to stop ppl from hoarding too many rosterbplayers.
|
|
|
Post by AvsGM on Aug 2, 2011 21:51:28 GMT -5
There is no reason to change the min or max. Gavin and I went over a bunch of stuff and it's fine. Teams just have to watch their spending, and if you have to make a move then that's what you gotta do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2011 7:43:02 GMT -5
There is no reason to change the min or max. Gavin and I went over a bunch of stuff and it's fine. Teams just have to watch their spending, and if you have to make a move then that's what you gotta do. That's the beauty of the cap...
|
|
|
Post by Philly on Sept 10, 2011 14:05:59 GMT -5
I think last season we did all 5 rds live, while we where on a roll, does anyone remember for sure?
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Sept 10, 2011 14:40:00 GMT -5
I think last season we did all 5 rds live, while we where on a roll, does anyone remember for sure? We've never done 5 live rounds, ever, it was 2 rounds, same as its always been.
|
|
|
Post by gmcanucks on Sept 10, 2011 15:21:45 GMT -5
I think Ray is right. I seem to remember we did all rounds live last year.
|
|
|
Post by MontyBurns on Sept 10, 2011 15:36:13 GMT -5
There is no chance. 1st and 2nd are live then 3-5 are list based. Been kike that since we shortened the draft from 7 to 5 rounds
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2011 16:37:15 GMT -5
I think Ray is right. I seem to remember we did all rounds live last year. I'm pretty sure we did as well. I think it was running smoothly so we just finished the rest of the draft out like that.
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques - Chris on Sept 10, 2011 18:04:41 GMT -5
I think last season we did all 5 rds live, while we where on a roll, does anyone remember for sure? We did! Pretty good memory there Ole Ray! (mine is definitely questionable at times!)
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Sept 11, 2011 1:28:40 GMT -5
<head tilt>....did we??? I honestly don't at all recall doing all 5 rounds live.
|
|