|
Post by Philly on Jul 29, 2008 9:43:20 GMT -5
Just a suggestion to save problems, you guys should include re-sign info with your trades, to save Gavin from having to look it up,and also avoid a re-play of the SJ-BUFF trade
|
|
|
Post by CanesGM on Jul 30, 2008 10:07:01 GMT -5
PLEASE make sure you change the last offical trade to Montreal auto re signs Chris Osgood, not Carolina
Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Jul 30, 2008 12:30:06 GMT -5
PLEASE make sure you change the last offical trade to Montreal auto re signs Chris Osgood, not Carolina Thanks Oops, my mistake, fixed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2008 11:32:01 GMT -5
If the Blues are getting St. Louis, shouldn't the Ducks get Anaheim?
By the way, I've put Boston on the block.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2008 11:53:57 GMT -5
lol.. ur a joker..
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Aug 1, 2008 12:27:14 GMT -5
If the Blues are getting St. Louis, shouldn't the Ducks get Anaheim? By the way, I've put Boston on the block. I'll trade you a bag of old pucks for Morinville
|
|
|
Post by Philly on Aug 8, 2008 11:05:25 GMT -5
Lecavalier is a huge pick up for Nash. Nice pick-up, Darren. I know I sent my bid in.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2008 11:36:26 GMT -5
I agree.. thats a huge deal for Nashville.. Calgary and Sanjose cant be happy about this, becasue Nashville has just made themselves a SERIOUS contender IMO. Was gonna say they could use an upgrade at defense,but their top 6 is pretty solid.
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques - Chris on Aug 13, 2008 12:26:40 GMT -5
Wow - I most have totally got smoket on my Kipper trade - record time for a trade of mine to go through...lol...what was the final count on the trade vote? Guess the gms in the West glad to see Kipper go...
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Aug 13, 2008 13:54:07 GMT -5
12-1 was the final tally.
|
|
|
Post by RangersRon on Aug 13, 2008 14:11:58 GMT -5
Buffalo is building nicely! If that other trade happens with Thornton along with Kipper, they will be right there in the east.........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2008 15:43:12 GMT -5
Nice play by Calgary to divest themselves of the soon to be albatross that is Kipper. By albatross I mean goalie who is going to suck the ass this year and have a nice 57 rerate next season. Is 57 good now or bad? I'm so confused.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2008 16:03:57 GMT -5
Nice play by Calgary to divest themselves of the soon to be albatross that is Kipper. By albatross I mean goalie who is going to suck the ass this year and have a nice 57 rerate next season. Is 57 good now or bad? I'm so confused. I was going to ask the same question... I think if you have a 57, you're pretty good lol. .
|
|
|
Post by Philly on Aug 13, 2008 17:10:24 GMT -5
He should re-rate about the same, 70-ish ov with the new software,which is pretty good, that's low 80's ov with old software.
|
|
|
Post by Hawks on Aug 14, 2008 11:21:13 GMT -5
The general ratings difference is about -10/-11. So an 80 OV players by old standards is a 69-71 OV player now. 57 = 67 (old standard), so no, its not good
|
|