|
Post by AvsGM on Jul 16, 2010 15:49:46 GMT -5
I will be posting trophy winners sometime later this evening. I'm also going to start to catalog everything and get the website ready for the new season. I got a ton of work to do so it may take a few days. I'm still waiting to see what the DVHL ratings will look like, but I have a few concerns that hopefully will be addressed. Other than that if you guys know of anyone who might want to join the league then please let me know. We can't start the offseason agenda without GMs in place for every team. That's about it for now.....
|
|
|
Post by RangersRon on Jul 16, 2010 16:31:07 GMT -5
Sounds good Jon! How many GM's do we need to replace?
I will keep track of messages while on the road. I am heading out of town again from 7/17 until 7/22. Hopefull the numbers will be done and we can move forward.
Thanks again for all you do Jon! You are the reason this league is so great and alot of the same GM's have stuck around.
|
|
|
Post by AvsGM on Jul 16, 2010 16:53:26 GMT -5
How many GM's do we need to replace? Right now definitely two (Anh, Van), maybe 3 (NYR), and whoever might decide they are no longer interested when I send out the activity check e-mail.
|
|
|
Post by LeafsGM on Jul 16, 2010 17:07:09 GMT -5
How many GM's do we need to replace? Right now definitely two (Anh, Van), maybe 3 (NYR), and whoever might decide they are no longer interested when I send out the activity check e-mail. I got one guy, he was interested last time we had a vacancy. I'll get him to email you Jon, and msg him and tell him to take a look at both teams. He will def be more active than van/anh, even tho that's not hard at all.
|
|
|
Post by Philly on Jul 16, 2010 17:13:56 GMT -5
I'm still waiting to see what the DVHL ratings will look like, but I have a few concerns that hopefully will be addressed. ??
|
|
|
Post by AvsGM on Jul 17, 2010 4:17:34 GMT -5
I'm still waiting to see what the DVHL ratings will look like, but I have a few concerns that hopefully will be addressed. ?? Well my biggest concern is consistency. I'm not sure if the guy who is doing the DVHL ratings will continue to do them every year. The ratings that we currently use have been around for several seasons, and the creator seems like he'll be making them for a while to come. The other issue I have with the DVHL ratings is bringing back all those players who have been out of the NHL for a bit. I really like using a rating set that only rates players who played in the previous NHL season. unfortunately only 83 goalies played last year which is why we have to use goalies from another rating set with AHL goalies. I have a copy of the DVHL ratings that they guy said he'd make and they are ok. They are very similar to what we are currently set to use, but I think I'd really like to stick with the original plan...Forwards and D from the NAIHL ratings set and goalies from the LCHV ratings set. I do feel that some of the ratings for goalies are a bit high in the LCHV set, but we need the amount of goalies that it has, so I don't see any other option really. I really think we should just stay the course.....
|
|
|
Post by Philly on Jul 17, 2010 4:48:04 GMT -5
I really think we should just stay the course..... I'm with you buddy. makes sense to stay the coarse.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2010 14:37:37 GMT -5
Congratulations to all the award winners. Great season guys, keep up the good work Jon. Love the vintage section too!
|
|
|
Post by LeafsGM on Jul 17, 2010 15:59:52 GMT -5
Haven't seen the DVHL ones, but see no issue with the NAIHL ratings. Seem pretty fair and consistent, with no favoritism and no "out of respect" ratings. Let's stick to em.
|
|
|
Post by Sharky on Jul 18, 2010 22:25:52 GMT -5
What about using the DVHL goalie ratings instead, if there is an issue with the LCHV ratings?
Other than that, I fully support using the NAIHL ratings.
|
|
|
Post by AvsGM on Jul 18, 2010 22:37:06 GMT -5
What about using the DVHL goalie ratings instead, if there is an issue with the LCHV ratings? Other than that, I fully support using the NAIHL ratings. There is no real issue with the LCHV goalie ratings. They are what we used last year as well. The problem I have with using the DVHL ratings is that I don't know if this was a one-time thing or if the guy will continue making them for seasons to come. Where as the ratings that we are set to use seem to have been around a while and look like they will continue to be. The other issue I have with the DVHL ratings is all the players who are like 2 and 3 years out of the NHL. If we use those ratings, then he doesn't make them again next year we will then most likely go back to a set that only rates players who played, thus removing all those guys once again and just creating a lot of work for nothing. That is why I'd rather just stay the course and continue with the original plan.
|
|
|
Post by BruinsGM on Jul 19, 2010 13:32:31 GMT -5
What about using the DVHL goalie ratings instead, if there is an issue with the LCHV ratings? Other than that, I fully support using the NAIHL ratings. There is no real issue with the LCHV goalie ratings. They are what we used last year as well. The problem I have with using the DVHL ratings is that I don't know if this was a one-time thing or if the guy will continue making them for seasons to come. Where as the ratings that we are set to use seem to have been around a while and look like they will continue to be. The other issue I have with the DVHL ratings is all the players who are like 2 and 3 years out of the NHL. If we use those ratings, then he doesn't make them again next year we will then most likely go back to a set that only rates players who played, thus removing all those guys once again and just creating a lot of work for nothing. That is why I'd rather just stay the course and continue with the original plan. I thought the DVHL ratings were really good this year. Won't having more players keep salaries down, too? If there's less talent available then the prices are going to go up.
|
|
|
Post by AvsGM on Jul 19, 2010 13:39:03 GMT -5
There is no real issue with the LCHV goalie ratings. They are what we used last year as well. The problem I have with using the DVHL ratings is that I don't know if this was a one-time thing or if the guy will continue making them for seasons to come. Where as the ratings that we are set to use seem to have been around a while and look like they will continue to be. The other issue I have with the DVHL ratings is all the players who are like 2 and 3 years out of the NHL. If we use those ratings, then he doesn't make them again next year we will then most likely go back to a set that only rates players who played, thus removing all those guys once again and just creating a lot of work for nothing. That is why I'd rather just stay the course and continue with the original plan. I thought the DVHL ratings were really good this year. Won't having more players keep salaries down, too? If there's less talent available then the prices are going to go up. Well I installed the new ratings the other day (what we're set to use) and so far I've already spent about 6 hours going through and keeping track of all the players that were on teams and under contract who got removed because they didn't play in the NHL last year (added to Under Contract link in clubhouse), and I'm only about half done! Let's say we use the DVHL ratings set this season and then they are not made next season. Because DVHL still rates players who are 2-3 years removed from the NHL I can't even imagine how long it would take to catalog all those players that were in DVHL ratings but not in the new ratings of only players who played.
|
|
|
Post by Philly on Jul 19, 2010 14:13:06 GMT -5
I thought the DVHL ratings were really good this year. Won't having more players keep salaries down, too? If there's less talent available then the prices are going to go up. Where did you see DVHL ratings, Jim? The ratings we are using, where done by the same dudes as last year, and we should stick with one or the other for logical reasons, we don't want to use ratings made by someone who can't be counted on, and didn't make ratings last season. I like the fact that players who didn't play last season, regardless of the past, don't get rated. That's the way it should be. If one can't manage their Cap by makin reasonable bids, that's their fault, I also didn't notice an increase in prices last season, as opposed to any other season.
|
|
|
Post by MontyBurns on Jul 19, 2010 15:19:44 GMT -5
honestly, lets give jon a break.
anyone else want to sift through hours and hours of work?
I dont. And i appriciate what jon does. Even though it might be nice to have other ratings, we are simply using what we had last year, and I dont think anyone was crying about how last year simmed out.
|
|